ȸ»ç¼Ò°³
´ë¿©¾È³»
´ë¿©¿ä±Ý
ÁöÁ¡¾È³»
¹®ÀÇ°Ô½ÃÆÇ
À¯ÀÍÇÑÁ¤º¸
¹®ÀÇ°Ô½ÃÆÇ
HOME > ¹®ÀÇ°Ô½ÃÆÇ > ¿¬¶ôó³²°ÜÁÖ¼¼¿ä
¼º¸í
³»¿ë
I like the Geneva Conventions as actually
writetn
(as opposed to how they are deliberately misinterpreted by the internationalist crowd).If a "civilian" is involved in torturing a prisoner, she becomes a combatant. If the "civilian" population gets actively involved in hostilities, it is a combatant force. If a military gives notice to a civilian population to leave a designated war zone, any people who refuse to leave the war zone can legitimately be regarded as combatants. If a religious or cultural building is used as a military base, it is legitimate under Geneva Conventions to attack such a building. If a reporter is engaged in fighting on one side against another, he becomes a combatant and is no longer due protections accorded to journalists.And so on. The Geneva Conventions need to be reclaimed by those fighting for freedom and defended against those who will abuse the laws of war as a means to express hatred of the American people or advance the cause of international socialism. I think the Geneva Conventions were never intended to become a means to ensure that every war is "Heads, Islamists Win; Tails, Americans Lose".
ºñ¹ø
»óÈ£¸í : (ÁÖ)¿ÀÄÉÀÌ·»Æ®Ä« ³²±¸¹Ì¿µ¾÷¼Ò »ç¾÷ÀÚµî·Ï¹øÈ£ : 513-85-15438
ÁÖ¼Ò : °æºÏ ±¸¹Ì½Ã ±¤Æòµ¿ 87-17¹øÁö À̸ÞÀÏ: 2002ok@hanmail.net
´ëÇ¥ÀüÈ : 054-456-0880 / ´ëÇ¥ÀÚ : ±èÁ¾Å¹ / ´ã´çÀÚ : ¾ç´öÈ